A benchmarking report to evaluate how Llama stacks up against GPT
Despite widespread hype about GenAI's potential, real-world adoption lags behind expectations, with only 30% of initiatives moving to production. This whitepaper focuses on benchmarking Llama and GPT models to explore if open-source LLMs can mitigate key security concerns raised by technology leaders without compromising key performance requirements.
"Evaluating Llama and GPT: LLM Adoption in Enterprises" benchmarks large language models (LLMs). Specifically, it evaluates how Llama 3.1, Llama 3.2, GPT-4, and GPT-4o perform against each other. It discusses the key concerns around LLM adoption enterprises and in industries such as healthcare, legal, and finance, where they deal with a lot of sensitive data. You will have access to proprietary test and experiment results around how open-sourced Llama in self-hosted environments fared against GPT in tasks like summarization, reasoning, and such.
The research uses some of the most critical evaluation frameworks, such as DeepEval and LegalBench, and benchmarks such as MMLU, BIG-Bench Hard, and Text2SQL. We evaluated the performance of each LLM model against key metrics such as answer relevancy, faithfulness, hallucination, and toxicity. We provide comparative results to enumerate the strengths and weaknesses of each model.
These metric-driven insights and verified benchmarks will enable digital leaders and AI practitioners to make informed decisions about LLM deployment. It also highlights the potential of Llama models to address critical enterprise needs while maintaining control over proprietary data, bridging the gap between GenAI’s promise and its real-world application.
Our clients love what we do:
Read less
Ada Glover
Co-Founder & Chief Product Officer
Backed by
a16z
Read less
Ozge Whiting
VP Data & Machine Learning
Backed by
Bayer
Read less
Evan Grossman
Chief Product Officer
Backed by
SignalFire
©2024 Zemoso Technologies. All rights reserved.